Signaling Inclusivity: Unveiling the Determinants of Corporate LGBTQIA+ Inclusivity Through Signaling Theory
Keywords:
Corporate Equality Index, CSR, Signaling Theory, Corporate Inclusivity PoliciesAbstract
Aim: This study aims to explore how U.S. corporations signal their commitment to LGBTQ+ inclusivity, using signaling theory as a framework.
Methodology: By analyzing a dataset of 700 companies and utilizing the Corporate Equality Index (CEI) from the Human Rights Campaign, the research examines the role of sector characteristics and voluntary participation in inclusivity efforts.
Results: Through univariate analysis, instrumental variable (IV) regression, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the study finds that consumer-facing sectors tend to signal a stronger commitment to inclusivity, reflected in higher CEI scores, while sectors with high injury risks show weaker or inverse correlations with inclusivity. Additionally, the findings highlight that the authenticity of inclusivity efforts – particularly voluntary reporting – is crucial, suggesting that genuine engagement, rather than mere compliance, enhances the effectiveness of inclusivity signaling.
Implications and recommendations: The implications for researchers include a deeper understanding of how sector dynamics and voluntary actions influence corporate inclusivity, while practitioners are advised to prioritize authentic engagement to effectively communicate their inclusivity values to stakeholders.
Originality/value: This research contributes to the literature by emphasizing the strategic importance of authentic inclusivity signaling in shaping corporate culture and external perceptions.
Downloads
References
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What We Know and Don’t Know about Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
Bae, S. M., Masud, M. A. K., & Kim, J. D. (2018). A Cross-country Investigation of Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainability Disclosure: A Signaling Theory Perspective. Sustainability, 10(8), 2611. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082611
Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2008). Factors Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 685-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9658-z
Černič, J. L. (2010). Human Rights Law and Business: Corporate Responsibility for Fundamental Human Rights. Europa Law Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngr006
Choi, S.-j., Shin, J., Kuper, P., & Zhang, L.-Y. (2023). Corporate Decisions on LGBT Friendliness: A Multi-level Approach. Management Decision, 61(4), 996-1012. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2022-1055
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 3967. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Typology and Frequency-based Analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90001-8
Deloitte. (2023). The Deloitte Global 2023 LGBT+ Inclusion @ Work Report. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/sk/Documents/human-capital/deloitte-global-2023-lgbt-inclusion-at-work%20FINAL%20(1).pdf
Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Roles of Stakeholder Orientation and Financial Transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 328-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682370.2009.00276.x
Everly, B. A., & Schwarz, J. L. (2015). Predictors of the Adoption of LGBT-friendly HR Policies. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21622
Fatmy, V., Kihn, J., Sihvonen, J., & Vähämaa, S. (2022). Does Lesbian and Gay Friendliness Pay Off? A New Look at LGBT Policies and Firm Performance. Accounting & Finance, 62(1), 213-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12787
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34
Gerber, P., & Gory, J. (2014). The UN Human Rights Committee and LGBT Rights: What Is It doing? What Could It Be Doing? Human Rights Law Review, 14(3), 403-439. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu019
González, T. A., Calluzzo, P., Dong, G. N., & Granic, G. D. (2022). Determinants of LGBTQ+ Corporate Policies. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 11(3), 644-693. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfac014
Grougiou, V., Dedoulis, E., & Leventis, S. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Organizational Stigma: The Case of ‘Sin’ Industries. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 905-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.041
Hetze, K. (2016). Effects on the (CSR) Reputation: CSR Reporting Discussed in Light of the Signaling and Stakeholder Perception Theories. Corporate Reputation Review, 19, 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-016-0002-3
Hossain, M., Atif, M., Ahmed, A., & Mia, L. (2020). Do LGBT Workplace Diversity Policies Create Value for Firms? Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 775-791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04158-z
Human Rights Campaign Foundation. (2023a). Corporate Equality Index. Human Rights Campaign Foundation.
Human Rights Campaign Foundation. (2023b). Corporate Equality Index 2023. Human Rights Campaign Foundation.
Hwang, C. G., Lee, Y.-A., & Diddi, S. (2015). Generation Y’s Moral Obligation and Purchase Intentions for Organic, Fair-trade, and Recycled Apparel Products. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 8(2), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2014.996917
Langlois, A. J. (2020). Making LGBT Rights into Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Lopatta, K., Tideman, S. A., Scheil, C., & Makarem, N. (2022). The Current State of Corporate Human Rights Disclosure of the Global Top 500 Business Enterprises: Measurement and Determinants. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 102512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102512
Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A Research Note on Standalone Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Signaling or Greenwashing? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(4-5), 350-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.008
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2023). UN Free & Equal Global Campaign to Promote Equal Rights for LGBTI People. https://www.ohchr.org/en/sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity/un-free-equal-globalcampaign-promote-equal-rights-lgbti-people
Palthe, J. (2014). Regulative, Normative, and Cognitive Elements of Organizations: Implications for Managing Change. Management and Organizational Studies, 1(2), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.5430/mos.v1n2p59
Pichler, S., Blazovich, J. L., Cook, K. A., Huston, J. M., & Strawser, W. R. (2018). Do LGBT-supportive Corporate Policies Enhance Firm Performance? Human Resource Management, 57(1), 263-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21831
Schrempf-Stirling, J., & Wettstein, F. (2017). Beyond Guilty Verdicts: Human Rights Litigation and its Impact on Corporations’ Human Rights Policies. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2889-5
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.172.0136
Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630
Shan, L., Fu, S., & Zheng, L. (2017). Corporate Sexual Equality and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 38(9), 1812-1826. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2624
Spence, M. (1978). Job Market Signaling. In P. Diamond, & M. Rothschild (Eds.) Uncertainty in Economics (pp. 281-306). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-214850-7.50025-5
Su, W., Peng, M. W., Tan, W., & Cheung, Y.-L. (2016). The Signaling Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Economies. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 479-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2404-4
Torugsa, N. A., O’Donohue, W., & Hecker, R. (2013). Proactive CSR: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of its Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions on the Association Between Capabilities and Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 383-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1405-4
Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9609-8
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation. (2023). Better Business: The Benefits of LGBTQ+ Inclusion in the Workplace. https://www.uschamberfoundation.org
Van Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. (2008). The Worth of Values: A Literature Review on the Relation Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9894-x
Withisuphakorn, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2016). The Effect of Firm Maturity on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Do Older Firms Invest More in CSR? Applied Economics Letters, 23(4), 298-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1071464
WorkCover Queensland. (2014). High Risk Industries. https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/laws-and-compliance/workerscompensation-laws/guidance-materials/high-risk-industries
Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. (2002). Note: Institutional Distance and the Multinational Enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 608-618. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4134406
Zerbini, F. (2017). CSR Initiatives as Market Signals: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2922-8
Zhou, A. (2021). Communicating Corporate LGBTQ Advocacy: A Computational Comparison of the Global CSR Discourse. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102061
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kinga Siuta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
