Stock Liquidity and Company Annual Reports. How Does Publishing the Annual Report Affect Stock Liquidity?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15611/fins.2025.2.01

Keywords:

management reports, stock liquidity, event-based method, Wilcoxon test, quantile regression

Abstract

Aim: This study examines how management reports affect stock liquidity and compares the responses of stocks with low, medium, and high liquidity.

Methodology: Stocks were classified into three liquidity groups based on the median Amihud (ILLIQ) ratio. The Wilcoxon test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to verify the result. Lastly, quantile regression was used to show the role of initial liquidity levels, especially in higher quantiles.

Findings: The main findings show that management reports generally affect stock liquidity, but stocks with lower liquidity display a stronger reaction. This means that new disclosures, especially for companies that already have weaker liquidity, can create larger market fluctuations.

Implications: These results are significant for investors and market regulators because they can use the insights to better manage risk and make more informed decisions. From a managerial perspective, understanding how liquidity responds to disclosures can help companies refine their communication strategies. Researchers can also apply this event-based approach to study how other types of reports or market conditions influence liquidity.

Originality/value: Focusing on management reports and their impact on liquidity in a less-studied market and using both nonparametric tests and quantile regression make this research unique, helping to understand how stocks with low liquidity may show more changes after management disclosures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amiram, D., Cserna, B., Kalay, A., & Levy, A. (2019). The information environment, volatility structure, and liquidity. Columbia Business School Research Paper, 15-62. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2618424

Balakrishnan, K., Billings, M. B., Kelly, B., & Ljungqvist, A. (2014). Shaping liquidity: On the causal effects of voluntary disclosure. Journal of Finance, 69(5), 2237-2278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12180

Baruník, J., & Čech, F. (2021). Measurement of common risks in tails: A panel quantile regression model for financial returns. Journal of Financial Markets, 52, 100562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2020.100562

Beaupain, R., & Joliet, R. (2011). Corporate drivers of market liquidity on the Warsaw stock exchange. Économie Internationale, 125(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.3917/ecoi.125.0083

Będowska-Sójka, B. (2018). The coherence of liquidity measures: Evidence from an emerging market. Finance Research Letters, 27, 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.02.014

Chan, K. (1993). Imperfect Information and Cross‐Autocorrelation among Stock Prices. The Journal of Finance, 48(4), 1211-1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04752.x

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419

Corwin, S. A., & Schultz, P. (2012). A simple way to estimate bid-ask spreads from daily high and low prices. Journal of Finance, 67(2), 719-759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01729.x

Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486

Florackis, C., Kontonikas, A., & Kostakis, A. (2014). Stock market liquidity and macro-liquidity shocks: Evidence from the 2007-2009 financial crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 44, 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.02.002

Holden, C. W., Jacobsen, S. E., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2014). The empirical analysis of liquidity. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2402215

Hope, O. K., & Liu, J. (2023). Does stock liquidity shape voluntary disclosure? Evidence from the SEC tick size pilot program. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(4), 2233–2270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09686-0

Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643

Krivin, D. R., Patton, R., Rose, E., & Tabak, D. (2003). Determination of the Appropriate Event Window Length in Individual Stock Event Studies. NERA Economic Consulting Working Paper. https:/10.2139/ssrn.466161

Le, H., & Gregoriou, A. (2020). How do you capture liquidity? A review of the literature on low-frequency stock liquidity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(5), 1170-1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12385

Naik, P., & Reddy, Y. V. (2021). Stock market liquidity: A literature review. SAGE Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020985529

Roll, R. (1984). A simple implicit measure of the effective bid-ask spread in an efficient market. Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1127-1139. https://doi.org/10.2307/2327617

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

Zhang, Q., Choudhry, T., Kuo, J. M., & Liu, X. (2021). Does liquidity drive stock market returns? The role of investor risk aversion. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 57(3), 929-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-021-00966-5

Downloads

Published

2025-12-09

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

Received 2025-03-26
Accepted 2025-10-23
Published 2025-12-09