Labour market policy in OECD countries – selected aspects
Keywords:
labour market, labour market policy (LMP), OECD countries, economic policyAbstract
The goal of the paper was to evaluate OECD countries in terms of labour market policy, and to create a measure allowing to divide the analysed countries according to public spending on labour market policy. Dealing with crises caused by exogenous and endogenous factors mainly consists in activating macroeconomic policy instruments, which requires a deeper analysis. One of the objectives of macroeconomic policy is full employment, pursued in particular through labour market policies – and this aspect of the state’s activities is presented extensively in the paper. First, on the basis of the OECD database, an analysis was made of the amount of funds spent on labour market policy: active and passive, measured as the percentage of the GDP of a given country. Secondly, based on the TOPSIS method and the CRITIC method, a synthetic measure with regard to public spending on labour market policy was created. These methods enabled to group the countries according to the number of these measures as well as in terms of the importance of labour market policy within macroeconomic policy. Thus countries were assigned to the labour market policy models analysed and presented in the earlier literature.
Research method: literature analysis (OECD reports), analysis of statistical data from the OECD database with the use of descriptive statistics methods, logical inference, analysis of cause-effect relationships, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method, the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method.
Hypotheses: OECD countries are diversified in terms of the labour market policy (measured as % of GDP); an active labour market policy plays a more important role in OECD countries than a passive one; the assignment of countries to the labour market policy models discussed earlier in the literature has changed.
Results: The analysis showed that the examined OECD countries were diversified in terms of labour market policy, as they focused on different instruments of this policy. However, the level of public spending on labour market policy increased in most countries in the period 2007-2019. Based on the employed methods, the author divided the OECD countries into four groups in terms of the role of labour market policy, and stated that in some OECD countries (e.g. Scandinavia), the policy on labour market (LMP) corresponded to the classification of models of LMP in the literature. Other OECD countries represented different models of LMP and different values of a synthetic measure and, in their case, this study did not confirm compliance with the theoretical models, however this could have resulted from the specification of the research or the change in the specific nature of labour market policy in these countries.
Value added: The literature offered varied typologies of labour market policy, most often derived from the models of implemented economic and social policy. This study contributes to the literature by investigating empirically the selected OECD countries in terms of labour market policy, and also compared the results with existing models of labour market policy in the literature.
References
Armingeon, K. (2007). Active labour market policy, international organizations and domestic politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(6), 905-932. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701497923
Bonoli, G. (2007). Time matters. Postindustrialisation, new social risks and welfare state adaptation in advanced industrial democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 495-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005285755
Bonoli, G. (2010). The political economy of active labour market policy. Working Papers on the Reconciliation of Work and Welfare in Europe. REC-WP 01/2010. RECWOWE Publication, Dissemination and Dialogue Centre.
Caliendo, M., & Schmidl, R. (2016). Youth unemployment and active labor market policies in Europe. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 5(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40173-016-0057-x
Calmfors, L. (1995). Labour market policy and unemployment. European Economic Review, 39(3-4), 583-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(94)00065-8
Costa Dias, M., Joyce, R., Postel‐Vinay, F., & Xu, X. (2020). The challenges for labour market policy during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Fiscal Studies, 41(2), 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12233
Crespo, N., Simoes, N., & Pinto, J. C. (2017). Determinant factors of job quality in Europe. Argumenta Oeconomica, 1 (38), 15-40.
Cvecic, I., & Sokolic, D. (2018). Impact of public expenditure in labour market policies and other selected factors on youth unemployment. Economic Research. Economska Istrazivanja, 31(1), 2060-2080, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2018.1480970
Deng, H., Chung-Hsing, Y., & Willis, R. J. (2000). Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research, 27(10), 963-973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00069-6
Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
Fargion, V. (2000). Timing and the development of social care services in Europe. West European Politics, 23, 59-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380008425367
Frączek, M. (2015). Cele rodzaje i efekty polityki rynku pracy. In M. Frączek (ed.), Polityka rynku pracy. Teoria i praktyka (pp. 45-53). PWE.
Hellwig, Z. (1968). Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom ich rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę kwalifikowanych kadr. Przegląd statystyczny, 15(4), 307-327.
Hung, C. C., & Chen, L. H. (2009) A Fuzzy TOPSIS Decision Making Model with Entropy Weight under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment. Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, 18-20 March 2009.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer-Verlag.
Karlson, N., & Lindberg, H. (2012). Corporate Cartels and Challenges to European Labour Market Models. Revista Internacional de Organizaciones, 9, 11-26.
Layard, R., Nickell, S. & Jackman, R. (2005). Unemployment, macroeconomic performance and the labour market. Oxford University Press.
Li, M. K., Liu, Y. K., Peng, M. J., Xie, C. L., & Yang, L. Q. (2018). The digital simulation and fuzzy evaluation to reduce the likelihood of unsafe behavior in nuclear decommissioning. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 119, 331-341.
Nagel, K., & Smandek, I. M. (2010). Polityka rynku pracy i źródła jej finansowania. Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach.
OECD (2022). Public spending on labour markets (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/911b8753-en (Accessed on 24 September 2022).
Rollnik-Sadowska, E. (2014). Transformation of European labour market policy models – exemplified by Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Optimum. Economic Studie, 5(71), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.15290/ose.2014.05.71.04
Rotar, L. J. (2022). Effectiveness of active labour market policies in the EU countries for the young unemployed people and implications for the post-pandemic period. Engineering Economics, 33(3), 326-337. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.33.3.29652
Vishnevskaya, N. T. (2022). OECD Countries: Labour market policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 66(1), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-1-110-118
Wiśniewski, Z. (1999). Kierunki i skutki deregulacji rynku pracy w krajach Unii Europejskiej. UMK.
Wiśniewski, Z. (2022). The effectiveness of Polish active labour market policies. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 56, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2022-0017
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Magdalena Knapińska, Katarzyna Woźniak-Jasińska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.